{"id":21890,"date":"2011-05-09T21:37:58","date_gmt":"2011-05-10T00:37:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spw.fw2web.com.br\/ptbr\/2011\/05\/09\/pelo-mundo-48\/"},"modified":"2024-02-05T21:57:20","modified_gmt":"2024-02-06T00:57:20","slug":"pelo-mundo-48","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890","title":{"rendered":"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL"},"content":{"rendered":"

O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL<\/strong>
\nRoger Raupp Rios*<\/em><\/p>\n

O Supremo Tribunal Federal decidiu, por unanimidade, que a uni\u00e3o cont\u00ednua, p\u00fablica e duradoura entre pessoas do mesmo sexo constitui entidade familiar, como uni\u00e3o est\u00e1vel (C\u00f3digo Civil, art. 1273). Pergunta-se: (1) Qual o significado desta decis\u00e3o? (2) Qual a repercuss\u00e3o para outras \u00e1reas? (3) O STF legislou, atropelando o Congresso Nacional? (4) Quais as conseq\u00fc\u00eancias pr\u00e1ticas da decis\u00e3o?<\/p>\n

(1)\u00a0 O significado\u00a0 \u00e9 inestim\u00e1vel para a consolida\u00e7\u00e3o da democracia e dos direitos fundamentais. Afirmaram-se direitos b\u00e1sicos, a todos reconhecidos, como a liberdade sexual, a proibi\u00e7\u00e3o de discrimina\u00e7\u00e3o sexual, a privacidade, a intimidade, o respeito \u00e0 dignidade da pessoa humana, a diversidade e o pluralismo.\u00a0 A afirma\u00e7\u00e3o quanto \u00e0 exist\u00eancia e \u00e0s conseq\u00fc\u00eancias destes direitos, especialmente na esfera da sexualidade, onde minorias sexuais s\u00e3o\u00a0 discriminadas, deixa claro o dever de respeito e a dignidade constitucional de que s\u00e3o merecedores homossexuais. Isto ainda que eventuais maiorias, por sondagens de opini\u00e3o ou por representantes eleitos, tentem impor seus preconceitos.<\/p>\n

(2)\u00a0 A repercuss\u00e3o se d\u00e1 em v\u00e1rios campos. A partir do incontest\u00e1vel dever de respeito \u00e0s minorias sexuais e da relev\u00e2ncia dos direitos sexuais, ficam superadas posturas que tentam justificar discrimina\u00e7\u00f5es no trabalho, na educa\u00e7\u00e3o, na sa\u00fade e nas mais diversas rela\u00e7\u00f5es sociais. Fica clara a urg\u00eancia e a necessidade de medidas antidiscriminat\u00f3rias, como a criminaliza\u00e7\u00e3o da homofobia. Ganha-se certeza sobre muitos temas, como por exemplo a possibilidade de postula\u00e7\u00e3o de ado\u00e7\u00e3o conjunta por pessoas do mesmo sexo em uni\u00e3o est\u00e1vel. Abrem-se caminhos para levar a igualdade mais a s\u00e9rio, inclusive no direito de fam\u00edlia, com o reconhecimento do direito ao casamento, como fez a Corte Constitucional da \u00c1frica do Sul.<\/p>\n

(3)\u00a0 O STF n\u00e3o legislou. Ele aplicou a pr\u00f3pria Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, que j\u00e1 protege a todos de discrimina\u00e7\u00e3o sexual, especialmente aqueles objeto de preconceito. Outros direitos tamb\u00e9m foram aplicados, especialmente a liberdade sexual e o respeito \u00e0 dignidade humana. Da\u00ed a conclus\u00e3o de que excluir as uni\u00f5es homossexuais \u00e9 restri\u00e7\u00e3o indevida, contra a Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, deixando claro que o par\u00e1grafo 3\u00ba do art. 226 da CF\/88 n\u00e3o torna\u00a0 a uni\u00e3o est\u00e1vel exclusiva para heterossexuais.<\/p>\n

(4)\u00a0 As conseq\u00fc\u00eancias s\u00e3o pr\u00e1ticas e efetivas. Todos os ju\u00edzes brasileiros est\u00e3o vinculados \u00e0 decis\u00e3o, n\u00e3o podendo mais rejeitar a uni\u00e3o est\u00e1vel pelo fato de serem pessoas do mesmo sexo. V\u00e1rios direitos da\u00ed decorrem, tais como: inclus\u00e3o em planos de sa\u00fade, previd\u00eancia, associa\u00e7\u00e3o como dependente em clubes e sociedades, dever de alimentos em caso de necessidade, divis\u00e3o de bens adquiridos na const\u00e2ncia da uni\u00e3o, direito \u00e0 heran\u00e7a, usufruto dos bens do falecido e acompanhamento de parceiro em institui\u00e7\u00f5es hospitalares. Sabedores desta posi\u00e7\u00e3o judicial, os particulares n\u00e3o mais poder\u00e3o justificar tratamento prejudicial ao prestarem servi\u00e7os ao p\u00fablico, muito menos sustentar.<\/p>\n

Para concluir: o STF cumpriu sua miss\u00e3o constitucional de fazer valer os direitos fundamentais de liberdade, de igualdade, de dignidade humana, de privacidade, de intimidade e de prote\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0s comunidades familiares, afirmando por dez votos a zero que homossexuais podem constituir uni\u00e3o est\u00e1vel.<\/p>\n

—
\n* Roger Raupp Rios. Juiz Federal, Mestre e Doutor em Direito (UFRGS), Professor do Mestrado em Direitos HUmanos (UniRitter), autor de v\u00e1rios livros sobre o tema (“Em Defesa dos Direitos Sexuais”, “A Homossexualidade no Direito”, “Direito da Antidiscrimina\u00e7\u00e3o”) e prolator da primeira senten\u00e7a sobre o tema (Justi\u00e7a Federal de Porto Alegre, 1996)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL Roger Raupp Rios* O Supremo Tribunal Federal decidiu, por unanimidade, que a uni\u00e3o cont\u00ednua, p\u00fablica e<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[283],"tags":[60,332,320],"class_list":{"0":"post-21890","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-artigos","7":"tag-brasil","8":"tag-lei-direito","9":"tag-lgbtqia"},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL - Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_BR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL - Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL Roger Raupp Rios* O Supremo Tribunal Federal decidiu, por unanimidade, que a uni\u00e3o cont\u00ednua, p\u00fablica e\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-10T00:37:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-06T00:57:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"SPW\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"SPW\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. tempo de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"SPW\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/person\/c19e8f16a900e3afaf000a0630e5ed2c\"},\"headline\":\"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-10T00:37:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-06T00:57:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890\"},\"wordCount\":622,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Brasil\",\"lei\/direito\",\"LGBTQIA\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Artigos\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890\",\"name\":\"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL - Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-10T00:37:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-06T00:57:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/\",\"name\":\"Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]\",\"description\":\"Um f\u00f3rum global composto por pesquisadores e ativistas de uma ampla gama de pa\u00edses e regi\u00f5es do mundo sites\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/logo-site-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/logo-site-1.png\",\"width\":4628,\"height\":1306,\"caption\":\"Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/person\/c19e8f16a900e3afaf000a0630e5ed2c\",\"name\":\"SPW\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5c20e28abc5a0cea3ce1737232d0dbff91638e672b6915ded85a617183e5e3b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5c20e28abc5a0cea3ce1737232d0dbff91638e672b6915ded85a617183e5e3b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"SPW\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/author\/sxpolitics\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL - Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890","og_locale":"pt_BR","og_type":"article","og_title":"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL - Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]","og_description":"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL Roger Raupp Rios* O Supremo Tribunal Federal decidiu, por unanimidade, que a uni\u00e3o cont\u00ednua, p\u00fablica e","og_url":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890","og_site_name":"Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]","article_published_time":"2011-05-10T00:37:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-06T00:57:20+00:00","author":"SPW","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"SPW","Est. tempo de leitura":"4 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890"},"author":{"name":"SPW","@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/person\/c19e8f16a900e3afaf000a0630e5ed2c"},"headline":"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL","datePublished":"2011-05-10T00:37:58+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-06T00:57:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890"},"wordCount":622,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#organization"},"keywords":["Brasil","lei\/direito","LGBTQIA"],"articleSection":["Artigos"],"inLanguage":"pt-BR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890","url":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890","name":"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL - Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-10T00:37:58+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-06T00:57:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-BR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/biblioteca-spw\/artigos\/pelo-mundo-48\/21890#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"O SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL E A UNI\u00c3O EST\u00c1VEL HOMOSSEXUAL"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/","name":"Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]","description":"Um f\u00f3rum global composto por pesquisadores e ativistas de uma ampla gama de pa\u00edses e regi\u00f5es do mundo sites","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-BR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#organization","name":"Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]","url":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-BR","@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/logo-site-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/logo-site-1.png","width":4628,"height":1306,"caption":"Sexuality Policy Watch [PTBR]"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/person\/c19e8f16a900e3afaf000a0630e5ed2c","name":"SPW","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-BR","@id":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5c20e28abc5a0cea3ce1737232d0dbff91638e672b6915ded85a617183e5e3b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5c20e28abc5a0cea3ce1737232d0dbff91638e672b6915ded85a617183e5e3b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"SPW"},"url":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/author\/sxpolitics"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21890"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21890\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24049,"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21890\/revisions\/24049"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sxpolitics.org\/ptbr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}